Category Archives: Employer Branding

Wally Olins on Employer Brand

I was searching for something on Amazon when Wally Olins’ ‘Brand New’ popped up in my ‘You might also like…’ list. At work we’d just had a debate about whether Employer Brand and Corporate Brand were distinctly separate things or just one and the same. So I thought I would read the latest musings of this master of Corporate Brand – made all the more poignant by his passing last month just after it was published.

Whilst Olins doesn’t mention the concept of Employer Brand per se, a lot of what he talks about is highly relevant for those involved in attracting and engaging workers with a brand. Here’s my summary of his insights in that context:

Wally Olins’ take on brand is absolutely aligned with others currently looking specifically at the power of your organisation’s identity in relation to your employees. He starts off with his articulation of the concept of ‘Brand’ – making it clear that it is so much more than just a logo. Trust and authenticity are central. Creating an authentic ‘Talent Brand’ is a core component of Kevin Keohane’s model in ‘Brand and Talent’.

He then discusses the importance of how we consume a brand – largely through our experience of interacting with the people who represent it. This is the central idea in Ian Buckingham’s ‘Brand Champions’.

He then moves on to look at the level of scrutiny consumers are putting companies under. The sheer volume of data and behind the scenes insight available now makes it easy for customers to learn far more about a company than what the PR and Marketing departments put out. He cautions that the ease with which disgruntled customers can mobilise a mass movement online should act as an incentive to be more trustworthy and authentic. The same is true for employees. LinkedIn and Glassdoor make it easy for potential employees to connect with real employees and find out what the employment experience is really like – not just what the recruitment advertising promises.

Of course, companies can dig up similar insights or potential customers or employees – credit checks, social media following, etc. “Mutual exposure” is how he sums it up – “There’s just no point in hiding anymore.”

Despite how much employers and customers/employees can get to know about each other, he laments the fact that we seem to have less and less personal contact. The drive to automate, outsource and increase efficiency has put more distance between the ability of organisations to have meaningful social exchanges with people – a point which is just as relevant to a candidate wading through an impersonal online application process as it is to a customer trying to print a return label from a self-service help and support portal.

Having summed up his views on the current state on branding, Olins then comes to what is, for me, a great call to action for what we should strive for. Five short points that can help you do a superior job with your (employer) brand:

  1. Knowing who you are
  2. Talking, listening and being engaged
  3. Showing who you are
  4. Embracing everything you do
  5. Managing it and making it work

His ideas for how we can get better at these five points are worth reading. It’s largely common sense – clearly not common practice – but expressed by someone with experience of what really works in branding and identity that few can match.

He brings these points to life with wit, insight and engaging stories that often reveal the ridiculousness of what branding has become. Everything from the automated text messages his mobile provider sends to pilots’ pre-flight announcements helps you see how lost many companies have become in their attempts to make us engage with their brands. The parallels in recruitment marketing, candidate experience and employment value propositions are all too easy to draw!

There’s inspiration here too for how we can become more imaginative in how we talk and how we act when trying to attract and engage customers or employees.

Olins then deals with two extremes – both of which are relevant from an employer’s perspective. He highlights how the errors big brands are making and the direction of travel for social media and online tools create incredible opportunities for new brands or challenger brands. They can exploit these opportunities to steal a march on their bigger competitors and occupy a space in the branding world that gives them a competitive edge.

The other extreme  is how lessons from Olins’ work on country and place branding can be applied to big companies. He was well known, and often derided, for his work for national and local Governments, helping them to brand their ‘place’. But if you think managing a brand for a large, complex organisation is difficult, imagine trying to do it for a whole country!

His ideas for how to engage disparate stakeholders, get everyone communicating the same messages and how to align behaviours and experiences behind what the brand stands for will make interesting reading for anyone trying to do the same in a big corporate environment.

The book then closes with his own thoughts on his career, and you have to wonder if he had a feeling that it would be the last book he would write.

He very humbly describes an illustrious career that pretty much set the standard for what good work on branding and corporate identify should be like. Wally Olins was one of the first people to just get what branding was about. His relevance to those of us focused on the employment side of corporate identity is summed up neatly in his description of what he realised after visiting different clients’ steel plants in India in the sixties. He was fascinated by how the environment and how employees behaved gave him a sense of what each organisation stood for, even though they all produced exactly the same thing:

 

“That is, looking back on it, when I began for the first time to sense that a corporation communicates what it is through everything that it does.”

Wally Olins

Mission critical – the case for an integrated EVP

Imagine your company is a planet, populated by your workforce. And I am one of billions of inter-planetary space travellers looking for a planet to settle on and work.

Your planet is broadcasting signals, sending people into space and establishing satellite outposts to try and persuade other travellers to trade with it, or come and settle.

I pick up some of your broadcasts, speak to some of your people – or other travellers who’ve visited or traded with your planet – and form a favourable impression of your planet (brand). I move into orbit and notice that some of your signals are appealing to me to come and work on your planet (talent brand).

I decide to enter your atmosphere. My journey to your planet could be quick and smooth (my recruitment experience); or it could be bumpy and take ages – to the point that I might have second thoughts, fire my rocket boosters and go to explore other planets instead.

If I do land on your planet, I am greeted by a welcoming committee (onboarding experience). Then I am sent to work on part of your planet. I might move around a bit to different areas and do different things with a variety of your citizens (work experience).

At some point you are either going to ask me to leave if you no longer need my skills and expertise, banish me for doing something wrong or failing to perform, or I’m going to pick up signals from another planet that seems more appealing and decide to blast off (leaving experience).

As I travel through space I will tell the people I meet about your planet, or I may even start broadcasting my own signals about my experience.

In short, my experience of your world has been coloured by everything from those first signals I picked up to how you dealt with me when I was leaving.

Now let’s consider who and what is responsible for my impression along each step of my journey:

Brand Marketing, advertising, PR, websites, branches, employees, former employees, customers and former customers
Talent Brand HR, recruiters, careers website, recruitment advertising, employees and former employees, social media, word of mouth, etc
Recruitment experience Careers website, HR, social media presence, job boards, employee referrals, recruitment agencies, outsourced providers, university careers offices, etc
Onboarding experience HR, L&D, line manager, colleagues, intranet, senior leaders, IT/facilities, etc
Work experience Line manager, colleagues, functional/department head, HR, L&D, senior leaders, Finance, IT/Facilities, internal communications,
Leaving experience Line manager, colleagues, HR, PR/news.social media

 

All of these elements contribute to the employee lifecycle experience, but there is no single owner of the experience who can manage it all. In fact, in my experience, different stakeholders in the employee lifecycle provide employees with very different – even contradictory – experiences. These range from the original promises made to candidates versus the actual work experience; to the official ‘corporate’ induction process versus the line manager’s induction process.

Therefore, to manage and control the process as effectively as possible – to stand the best chance of creating a long-lasting and positive experience for both the organisation and the employee – doesn’t it make sense for each stakeholder to draw on a common, underlying employment value proposition?

If such a thing were to exist in the organisation, and all the stakeholders attempted to create an experience for employees based on its principles, then greater alignment would exist between the promise makers (branding and recruitment efforts) and the promise keepers (HR, line managers and fellow employees).

Assess your EVP and employer brand with the Marketing Exchange Circle

Most explanations of the marketing exchange process only explain a simple, single transaction: I give you currency in exchange for a product or service I value. The Marketing Exchange Circle, whilst still simple, explains the whole value creation process and is particularly relevant for people developing an employment value proposition (EVP) or employer brand. It was introduced to me a long time ago by one of my Marketing lecturers – Don Bathie (its creator).

First of all, the employer has to create something of value – the proposition. The offer to the talent marketplace to come and work here.

Marketing Exchange Circle

In my experience, the most critical element of this is making it different and distinctive from your competitors (the competition for talent, not necessarily the competitors for your consumers).

Marketing Exchange Circle

Then you have to communicate this value to the marketplace. You decide on the messages, the media, etc to convey the value you offer to the people you most want to attract, in the most compelling way. This is the promise you are making to potential employees.

Then, crucially, you have to deliver value. You have to keep your promise. And this includes everything from the onboarding experience you provide, the work environment and how the person’s line manager behaves, to the sort of work the person will be doing and how they will be rewarded, developed and recognised.

You will also have noticed that there’s a cycle going in the other direction. This represents the candidate and the exchange that takes place at each point in the circle.

Marketing Exchange Circle

Firstly, the candidate has to create something of value for the employer. This is the ‘talent’ they offer – the skills and experience they have accumulated that make them attractive to the organisation.

Then they have to deliver themselves to a touch point with the organisation. This could be finding a careers site, having a conversation with an existing employee that could refer them or crafting a LinkedIn profile that you notice.

The candidate and organisation then exchange information. The organisation gets valuable feedback on whether what it is communicating is successfully explaining the value on offer. Is the right talent engaging and responding? If not, the organisation needs to refine its recruitment marketing.

If it is, the candidate is likely to be attracted to the organisation and vice versa. During the selection process a further exchange of information lets each party assess the value on offer.

If the candidate then joins the organisation another exchange occurs as the candidate – now an employee – can feedback to the organisation whether the value proposition it created is sufficient to retain and engage that person. It will be obvious if it’s not through either a drop off in performance against expectations or attrition.

And so the cycle continues around the circle again – with the organisation using that feedback to refine and enhance its value proposition to take to market again; and the employee using the value he/she has derived to make himself/herself even more attractive and valuable to retain and/or promote. Otherwise the employee will leave and use their own enhanced value proposition to engage with another employer.

The Marketing Exchange Circle is a simple but very practical tool you can use to assess the strength of your EVP and brand:

  • Attrition data and exit interviews will tell you how you need to improve your value proposition
  • Attraction metrics will tell you if you’re communicating this effectively, and
  • Your offer acceptance rate and engagement scores will tell you if you’re delivering sufficient value

Any weak link in the circle will cause it to collapse.

I have found the Marketing Exchange Circle to be really useful in explaining the value creation process to people and helping them understand how what they do has an impact on what you are trying to achieve – whether that’s designing a proposition, communicating it or getting other parts of the organisation to deliver on the promise.